# Are there plan to support openssl1.1.x within Confd?

**URL:** <https://dmap-community.ductus.global/t/are-there-plan-to-support-openssl1-1-x-within-confd/2195>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [December 19, 2018, 6:01am UTC](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/t/are-there-plan-to-support-openssl1-1-x-within-confd/2195 "2018-12-19T06:01:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fduan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecae2f/32.png) [@fduan](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/u/fduan)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2018, 6:01am UTC](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/t/are-there-plan-to-support-openssl1-1-x-within-confd/2195/1 "2018-12-19T06:01:45Z")

</div>

In current, it only run confd within openssl version \< 1.1.0

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mnovak](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex010/user_avatar/dmap-community.ductus.global/mnovak/32/183_2.png) [@mnovak](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/u/mnovak)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2018, 8:20am UTC](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/t/are-there-plan-to-support-openssl1-1-x-within-confd/2195/2 "2018-12-19T08:20:25Z")

</div>

Partly discussed here [Compile fails on ubuntu 18.04](https://discuss.tail-f.com/t/compile-fails-on-ubuntu-18-04/2180/3) .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fduan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecae2f/32.png) [@fduan](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/u/fduan)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2018, 12:58am UTC](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/t/are-there-plan-to-support-openssl1-1-x-within-confd/2195/3 "2018-12-20T00:58:17Z")

</div>

Does that mean no plan to support openssl 1.1.x within confd in future?  
While from erlang’s 20+ version, it did support openssl 1.1.0 now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fduan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ecae2f/32.png) [@fduan](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/u/fduan)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2018, 7:32am UTC](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/t/are-there-plan-to-support-openssl1-1-x-within-confd/2195/4 "2018-12-20T07:32:12Z")

</div>

Anybody met similar requirement for openssl upgrade?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jjohansson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b782af/32.png) [@jjohansson](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/u/jjohansson)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2018, 2:28pm UTC](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/t/are-there-plan-to-support-openssl1-1-x-within-confd/2195/5 "2018-12-20T14:28:48Z")

</div>

No. It means that at some time in the future the Erlang/OTP runtime shipped with ConfD will be upgraded to version 20 (or some later version). At that point, ConfD will support OpenSSL 1.1.x (or later).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jmordkof](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e56c9b/32.png) [@jmordkof](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/u/jmordkof)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2018, 8:16pm UTC](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/t/are-there-plan-to-support-openssl1-1-x-within-confd/2195/6 "2018-12-27T20:16:16Z")

</div>

+1  
supporting libssl-dev 1.0 just for one component is going to make our development environment harder to manage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cohult](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex010/user_avatar/dmap-community.ductus.global/cohult/32/221_2.png) [@cohult](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/u/cohult)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2018, 9:50pm UTC](https://dmap-community.ductus.global/t/are-there-plan-to-support-openssl1-1-x-within-confd/2195/7 "2018-12-27T21:50:45Z")

</div>

On Ubuntu 18.04 for example you don’t need the libssl-dev 1.0 package. Only the [libssl1.0.0](https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/libssl1.0.0) package in addition to the [libssl-dev](https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/libssl-dev) (1.1) package.